Thursday, February 27, 2025

New Books Network interview with the authors of Revolutionary Taiwan

New Books Network has a great interview with Catherine Lila Chou and Mark Harrison about their book, Revolutionary Taiwan: Making Nationhood in a Changing World Order, which I wrote briefly about earlier.  (That's a lot links in one sentence!)

As a writing teacher, I really liked listening to their discussion early on about their writing process and how they viewed the kind of book they were trying to write. Harrison calls the style of the book that they were going for as "readable academic," where on the one hand they didn't want to write a dense academic monograph but on the other wanted to do justice to the complexity of Taiwan's histor(ies) and identit(ies). He says that that they "landed on" the idea of starting with events from contemporary Taiwan and interpret those events in terms of Taiwan's histor(ies) and culture(s). Chou compares the chapters and style of writing in terms of New Yorker essays that begin with specific stories that "bring the reader in" and then unpeel the "multiple layers" of meaning that make up those stories. She also talks about their limitations as academics that made it more challenging to them to write in this style. They also talked about how they collaborated on the book from a great distance (Chou was in Taiwan and Harrison was in Australia for most of the process, much of which took place during the Covid pandemic.) These are all interesting reflections that I'd like to point my students to when we talk about the writing process, envisioning your audience, collaborating as writers (particularly in online classes where students might not ever meet in person), and reflecting on writing, as well. 

The authors also bring up the image of Taiwan's "spectral presence," which (as I've said elsewhere, I think) is a concept that has come up a lot in my reading lately in relation to Taiwan. I mentioned the metaphor of "hauntings" that are prominent in two books I read recently, Anru Lee's Haunted Modernities and Kim Liao's Every Ghost Has a Name. Derek Sheridan also wrote an article a few years ago about "the spectre of American empire" in Taiwan. The idea that Taiwan itself has a "spectral presence," though, as a country/not-country (in terms of international recognition) that exists in almost a ghostly form outside of time and place is new and insightful to me. 

This blog also got a hat tip in the discussion (which, of course, is the real reason I'm talking about this interview!), citing a post of mine summarizing an article discussing Taiwanese cooking shows. (This reminds me--I haven't written any summaries of communications articles about Taiwan in quite a while!)

Saturday, February 22, 2025

Finished Studying Taiwan Before Taiwan Studies

Studying Taiwan before Taiwan Studies: American Anthropologists in Cold War Taiwan was a relatively easy book to read, as most oral histories are, I suppose. I read the English half of it, though I suppose it might be useful to look through the Chinese half at some point to see if there's anything different about it. I enjoyed reading about the anthropologists' experiences in Taiwan and the challenges that many of them faced when trying to do anthropological research there. 

One challenge that came up several times involved language issues. Many of the anthropologists interviewed were quite transparent about how linguistically unprepared they were to do their research; in fact, it was almost assumed that they would not be able to do the research without the help of local assistants. One reason was that they often didn't have the opportunity to learn Taiwanese (Hokkien) at the Stanford program at National Taiwan University, which sounds like it was dominated by teachers with Beijing Beiping accents. Then they'd go into the "field" and find out that no one there spoke Mandarin like that (or spoke much Mandarin at all!). Stevan Harrell expresses his admiration for Emily Ahern/Emily Martin because of how good her Taiwanese was. He contrasts her to Arthur and Margery Wolf, who were not fluent in Taiwanese and had to "hire lots of assistants." (Note that he says both Martin and Wolf "had a big influence" on him.) 

Another interesting point about their methods came up in Harrell's description of Wolf:

Arthur was also very shy. Every time he would interview someone, he would bring along [his assistant] Little Wang, the hoodlum. Every time he went out, he went with Little Wang. Wang would go to the front and speak, and Arthur would shyly stand in the back and smile. He didn't directly ask questions. 

After reading this, I felt a little better about my own stumbling efforts at interviewing people for my dissertation.

Another anthropologist, Burton Pasternak, tells about his first attempts to engage in fieldwork in a rural village after he had spent some time trying to find a village that he could work in. There's an amusing anecdote about him walking into a government office and asking for detailed maps of the area's villages. As he puts it, considering this was in the middle of the martial law period, "It's a miracle I wasn't tossed in the clink right off." He found out that he had to go back to Taipei to get a letter of introduction from the Academia Sinica. Then when he found his village (Datie, 打鐵, in Pingtung County), he and his wife moved in. He writes, 

Here I was, a young and inexperienced anthropologist (in waiting) with meager Mandarin skills in a Hakka village. I suddenly became acutely aware that I had no clue where to begin. I knew virtually no one in the village apart from my incredulous but generous hosts.

So when morning arrived, I took my notebook and tentatively left the compound, like a young bird finally leaping from the nests on his first flight. There I was in the street. People stared at me, and I looked back. So what's next? Fortunately, our hosts had anticipated all this and instantly took me under their wing. They brought me back into the house and suggested that perhaps they could introduce me to some villagers just to get me started, which they promptly did.  And those people introduced me to others. So gradually, I met and interviewed every family in Datie. With very few exceptions, they were to become friends. Gradually, they came to believe that I was harmless, and, in return, I was provided a constant source of amusement. 

(Hmmm... I don't know if he means he was amused or if he means he was amusing. From my own experience, I'm guessing the latter!) 

There are a lot of other interesting and entertaining anecdotes and observations in the book, but I want to end by mentioning something that Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang and Derek Sheridan write in their introduction to the book--mainly because it echoes something that I wrote about in my dissertation about the Oberlin Shansi reps in Taiwan. Yang and Sheridan contrast the experiences of the American Cold War-era anthropologists ("in waiting," as Pasternak writes) with the suggestion by some critics that as Americans, they were "lackeys of American imperialism." "In fact," they write, "it was sometimes the opposite" since they were often critical of the US role in Asia. Yang and Sheridan continue,

So much has been said about the relationship between "power" and knowledge production." Yet this sort of abstract theorization usually falls short of illustrating the complex processes that actually took place on the ground, processes that involved a web of intricate personal relations, individual choices, and delicate human emotions. 

This reminded me of something I had written in a paper about the Oberlin reps at Tunghai, that there is a danger in automatically mapping individual encounters between people onto a template of international relations; it's that danger of "situating [an individual's ]acts of cultural translation solely within a framework of American attempts at global expansion—a framework that risks considering those acts predictable in their motivations, their contents, and their effects. Unpredictability, or surprise, is an important element of encounters, as [Oberlin rep Judith Manwell] Moore describes them, as these experiences open up possible futures just as they are made possible by people and institutions with multiple, overlapping histories." While the Oberlin reps weren't anthropologists (at least most of them didn't have that kind of training), like anthropologists, they were attempting to understand others and communicate that understanding to "other others." I think they would agree with Yang and Sheridan's observation that "what individual anthropologists [or Oberlin reps] learned and experienced in their field sites is often more complicated and profound that the information published in their works." 

Back to Long Ying-tai's book now? Hmmm... I actually have an urge to read this book I've had for a while about the history of Taiwan's No. 1 Provincial Highway

Friday, February 21, 2025

Pioneering Taiwan Studies workshop videos

I see that the U of Washington Taiwan Studies Program has posted some videos of its "Pioneering Taiwan Studies" workshop from last November. Last night, I watched the one where Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang presented about the history of Western anthropologists in Taiwan. The conversation afterwards among the senior anthropologists (such as Hill Gates, David K. Jordan, Stevan Harrell, Robert Weller, etc.) was interesting and at time entertaining. (At one point, Jordan complained about the IUP "Stanford" Chinese language program at National Taiwan University, which he claimed was very unfriendly toward University of Chicago folks.) 

I'm looking forward to watching some of the other videos, and I've decided that I'm going to put Long Ying-tai's book aside in favor of the book Yang introduced (and co-edited), Studying Taiwan Before Taiwan Studies: American Anthropologists in Cold War Taiwan. It's an oral history, and it looks really interesting. 

One thing I wonder about (which I imagine no one brings up) is possible connection between these anthropologists and the Oberlin Shansi reps at Tunghai University. I know that William Speidel, former Shansi rep to Tunghai, ran IUP in Taipei for five years from 1975-1980. Maybe some of the later anthropologists in this book ran into him. Would love to hear from anyone who knows anything about this.

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Taiwan Studies Pioneers, Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang

From Nov., 2024:

Presented at the University of Washington: 

The recent publication of Studying Taiwan before Taiwan Studies: American Anthropologists in Cold War Taiwan (Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica, 2024), co-edited by Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang, Derek Sheridan, and Wen-liang Tseng, offers an oral history volume of a generation of anthropologists who pioneered Taiwan Studies.  This panel will be an open, group discussion of the volume. It will begin with a background of the project from co-editor Dominic Yang, followed by an open discussion to all participants.  We will ask that participants read parts of the volume before the workshop in preparation for this discussion.

Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang, Associate Professor, University of Missouri 

Niki Alsford, Professor of Anthropology and Human Geographys, UCLan

James Lin, Assistant Professor, University of Washington

This event was made possible by the generous support of the Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange.

Monday, February 17, 2025

Finished The Great Exodus from China

I just finished reading Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang's The Great Exodus from China: Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Modern Taiwan. I can't say I enjoyed the book--it's about trauma, after all--but I appreciated Yang's work on it and especially his generous use of Taiwan scholarship in the process. I've complained elsewhere about English-language books on Taiwan that don't cite Taiwanese scholarship as much as I think they should; I'm glad to see that Yang took that scholarship seriously. (My one complaint is that in his bibliography, the titles of Chinese-language books and articles are only written in pinyin--I'd prefer characters. But perhaps that's an editorial decision that Yang had no control over.)

The book is an interesting combination of archival work, interviews, readings of fiction and non-fiction from the time periods discussed, along with some statistical information (as when Yang argues that the numbers of mainlanders coming to Taiwan during and after the KMT defeat was less than usually assumed). I appreciated the variety of sources he brought to his study. I also appreciate his reflections on his own positionality in relation to his subject. I think it was an important (but probably controversial) move. I'll have to look at some reviews of the book later on to see how reviewers responded to this approach. (I am having trouble accessing NU's library databases right now, so I'll come back to this later.)

What's the next book on my list? I'm not sure right now. Yang's discussion of Long Ying-tai's 《大江大海1949》 makes me want to read that book just to get my own impression of it. We'll see, though... Maybe I want to read something less traumatic!

Update, 9:33 p.m. I found some reviews of the book. Here are a few:

Qian, L. Behind the History and Sociology of Memory: A Review of Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang’s The Great Exodus from China: Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Modern Taiwan (2021, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Int J Polit Cult Soc 37, 291–298 (2024). https://rdcu.be/eagUR  

Yang, D.MH. A Reply to Licheng Qian’s “Behind the History and Sociology of Memory: A Review of Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang’s The Great Exodus from China: Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Modern Taiwan (2021, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)”. Int J Polit Cult Soc 37, 299–307 (2024). https://rdcu.be/eagVZ

A couple of quotes from Yang's response to Qian that caught my eye--they expand on the question I had above regarding his discussion of his positionality in relation to his topic:

My family immigrated to Canada from Taiwan when I was a young teenager. Taiwan is located in the strategic contact zones between Chinese, Japanese, and American empires. I learned about my home island’s painful and multilayered history of migration and colonialism belatedly as a graduate student returning from Canada. This history included my family’s anguish and sorrow caused by the arrival of the mainlanders in the mid-twentieth century, a past that my grandparents and parents had kept largely silent. Faced with the complexity and nuances of different but interconnected traumatic experiences on the island, I was absolutely overwhelmed. My [305||306] conflicting emotions of loyalty toward my own victimized family members and the profound empathy that I gradually developed for the hundreds of thousands of waishengren families through my archival research and fieldwork had tormented me. Given my positionality, I did not know how to tell the waishengren story adequately and “objectively.” How should a descendent of the colonized and victimized write about the trauma of the former colonizers and victimizers? (305-306)

...... 

Many are going to be skeptical about the modality, as well as the sincerity of my transformation. The skepticism is understandable. Building empathetic understand-ing and rapprochement among communities, people, and nations holding serious grudges against one another is easier said than done. It is a long and difficult “working through” process where all parties have to be wholeheartedly committed. I have been told in private by a number of colleagues in Taiwan that intellectuals in certain local circles on both ends of the mnemonic divide do not really appreciate what I am doing. A second-generation mainlander professor told his German colleague who was attending one of my talks in Taiwan: “Who does this guy think he is? We don’t need his sympathy!” (306) 

Harrison, H. (2021). [Review of the book The Great Exodus from China: Trauma, Memory and Identity in Modern Taiwan, by Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang]. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 52(2), 306-307. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/803869

Yung, K. K. (2023). Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang, The Great Exodus from China: Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Modern Taiwan. International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 6(1), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1163/24688800-20221258

Gustafsson, K. (2023). [Review of the book The Great Exodus from China: Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Modern Taiwan, by Dominic Meng-Hsuan Yang]. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 83(1), 231-235. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jas.2023.a922635.

Sunday, February 09, 2025

Podcast from the past--on YouTube

I just noticed that an interview I did with Keith Menconi for an ICRT podcast almost 10 years ago about Vern Sneider's A Pail of Oysters is up now on YouTube. 

It's not exactly visually stimulating, but Keith did a good job editing the interview to make me sound reasonably intelligent.

Wednesday, February 05, 2025

February slowdown

As I sort of predicted in my last post, my book-reading has hit the wall. Part of it is that my workload has gone up now that we're into the semester. But I also caught a cold last week that knocked me out for a while, and now I'm feverishly working to catch up on my work (not literally feverish, fortunately). 

I haven't been closely following it, but the story of 大S's (徐熙媛) death from flu-related pneumonia was quite a shock to a lot of people. It appears that her death has a lot of Taiwanese inquiring about getting flu vaccines, which I guess is a good outcome from a tragic event. You can't be too careful. 

Anyway, back to work now...