I just joined Bluesky for some reason. I'd like to find people who are interested in talking about comparative rhetoric and books about Taiwan.
I'm not sure if I'll stay on; if it seems worth it, I'll stay, but right now I don't see much going on that I'm interested in.
As I like to say to my mom, "We'll see what happens."
They don't all apply, but they're food for thought:
"One thing a lot of Democrats are thinking about these days" (11/7/04)
"Faith and rhetoric in the U.S. election (and beyond)" (11/7/04)
"A note from an Ohio 'Blue'" (11/11/04)
For some reason, I didn't notice the overlap between the themes of the two books I wrote about--even though they're right in the titles! It wasn't until I went to hear Kim Liao talk about her book and answer a question about her choice of title that it clicked with me that both of the books are about hauntings. (Hence the title of my blogpost.) Anru Lee's book, Haunted Modernities, involves both the literal and figurative ghostly presence of the 25 "maiden ladies" who died in the 1973 ferry accident in decisions about how to honor them even as Kaohsiung's economy and culture shifted from industrial to post-industrial and to a tourist destination. Kim Liao's book, Where Every Ghost Has a Name, at times describes Thomas Liao's ghostly presence guiding Kim through her journey of learning about him.
While the first book is an anthropological work and the second a memoir, they both take seriously Taiwanese beliefs about the afterlife. Lee in particular doesn't try to explain away the spiritual aspects but situates it among the cultural and economic changes in Kaohsiung (and at the same time situates the cultural and economic changes among the spiritual aspects of the lives and deaths of the 25 young women).
One story in Lee's book that exemplifies this involves a Kaohsiung City employee, Mr. Lin, who around 2006 was tasked with the job of getting the family members of the deceased female workers to agree to renovate their tombs. The family members had to ask the deceased young women by casting divination blocks. They got agreement from most of them, but one deceased woman wouldn't respond to her surviving sister. Finally, Mr. Lin agreed to talk to the deceased sister himself.
However, he also did not get a good response, even after multiple attempts. "After a while, I had to consult a religious practitioner at a local temple and learn to phrase my plea in a hard-to-refuse way," Lin explained. ...
Even so, an unequivocal "yes" was still hard to come by. Mr. Lin begged and begged, and even promised to bring fruits as offerings to the deceased every month in the future. ... "In the end, I told them I was only a minor employee who took orders from some big boss [i.e., the mayor] and pleaded with them to understand my quandary. As soon as I said that, they granted me a divine answer. [These women] certainly know the difficulties of being someone's subordinate!" (138-9)
Anru Lee gave a talk today about her book at the University of Washington. In the Q&A period, there was a lot of talk about "haunting as method" in Lee's book:
I just finished reading Anru Lee's Haunted Modernities, which was a fascinating study of the intersections of memory, feminism, women's lives (and deaths), modernization, industrialization, post-industrialization, and local traditional religious beliefs and practices in Taiwan. I'd love to use it in a class, but I'm not sure that I'm ever going to teach a class in which I can teach it...
Here's a podcast interview with Anru Lee about her book.
I had put Lee's book aside briefly, partly due to work and partly because I wanted to finish Kim Liao's book Where Every Ghost Has a Name before she comes to Northeastern this coming Wednesday. I enjoyed this book, too. It gave me a new perspective on Thomas Liao, an historical figure I've read about mostly through the lens of his correspondence with George H. Kerr. It also ties in to my honors course text, Mira Shimabukuro's Relocating Authority, in interesting ways, particularly in terms of how they're both investigating histories that were suppressed both by unsympathetic governments and by the survivors of past trauma who sometimes just wanted to forget about the past.
Here's an interview with Kim Liao about her book.
Need to watch this video sometime.
Just picked up (well, was sent) a new book from the University of Washington Press on the CIA and the Asia Foundation, a Cold War-era nonprofit/CIA front (that is now evidently not funded by the CIA, I guess). The book is Cold War Deceptions: The Asia Foundation and the CIA, by David H. Price.
One thing I'll be reading this book for is how it extends or differs from Emma North-Best's long article on the CIA and the Asia Foundation on the MuckRock website. I remember reading that article a few years ago after I came across a 1951 letter from Philip Horton, assistant editor of The Reporter, to Allen Dulles, who was "Deputy Director for Plans" at the CIA at the time (if Wikipedia is correct).
In the letter, Horton quotes a letter he had received from Kerr (who was at the Hoover Library at the time), in which Kerr criticized the Committee for a Free Asia (the precursor to the Asia Foundation). Kerr reported on a visit to Hoover by CFA president George H. Greene, Jr.* (not sure what his first name was). Kerr continued,
Either the management is extraordinarily naive, or they assume us to be so. The line will be almost unmodified extension of the Voice of America or U.S.I.S. propaganda. "Tell the Asians how wonderful life is in America, how good our institutions are, and how very very wicked and dangerous the Communists are." There is heavy emphasis on the latter approach, with little ready response to our questions concerning positive content. It was freely admitted that China is the primary concern. Chiang is to be neither praised nor condemned. "Counterpart Committees" will be set up overseas, operating under guarantees that the local government will not influence nor affect the content of propaganda. It was asserted that such a condition was expected to obtain in Formosa, which is to be a principal base of operations.
It has been pointed out to the representatives of the Committee that (1) most Asians are tired of hearing how good we are, and the history of our representative institutions has little bearing on their problems, for the conditions surrounding their evolution cannot be duplicated in Asia; (2) most non-Chinese Asians fear a strong China, whatever its political orientation, and will hardly respond with enthusiasm to a rally in support of "anti-Communist government" for China, especially if it means support for the Nationalists; (3) Formosa cited as an example of "Free Asia" would be damaging nonsense.
Those of us who talked with Greene have a troubled sense that the Administration may have decided to switch to all-out support for the Nationalists, hopefully trusting that Chiang may be thrust aside, and that the Committee not only has the State Department's blessing in this attempt to sweeten the picture, but is most actively setting it up. Each of us asks the other if at any point the [China] Lobby may be putting up funds. Odd to conceive, but not impossible in Washington.
Actually, if the thing were worked out on a realistic appraisal of the American position in Asian eyes, it could do an enormously important job, unhampered by red tape.
Wonder if this letter helped get Kerr in any trouble with the government...
*All you had to do was look in the index of the book you just bought, Jon... 🙄
I just got my copy of Kim Liao's Where Every Ghost Has a Name: A Memoir of Taiwanese Independence, which came into print (or "dropped," as the youngsters say) a few days ago. I read a little of it on the Amazon website (as much as I could) while I waited for the hardback copy, and I can't wait to read it. I'm going to put it next on my list after finishing Anru Lee's Haunted Modernities. (Interestingly, Lee has a blurb on the back of Liao's book.)
I'm especially interested in seeing how Kim Liao treats the relationship between Thomas Liao and his family and George H. Kerr. I realize that, as K. Liao says, this is a work of creative nonfiction, so some of the conversations between the characters are reimagined, but I want to see how her perspective on Kerr compares to my own perspective.
Kim Liao is coming to Northeastern in October, so I guess I'd better get going on reading her book!
